Investment portfolios are equivalent to financial badges of honor that investors wear with pride! Any investors should have a diverse and dynamic portfolio not only to show that you can handle almost every type of investments as an investor but to have a pretty wide net of investments that have different rates of profits and loss. In fact, since diversity is what you’re aiming for your investment portfolio, why not add bitcoins in the mix?

Understandably, the reception of bitcoins can be a hit or miss when it comes to public opinion—and in terms of investments, diversity can be a good goal for every investor to achieve. In this case, why should bitcoins be included in an investment portfolio for the sake of diversity?

Experts Trust Bitcoin

Bitcoin is one of the world’s most popular forms of cryptocurrencies. The currency, also known as ‘cryptocurrency’, has been a subject of trust and distrust among modern financial experts, including well-known economists from Yale, Aleh Tsyvinski and Yukun Liu. Their research shows that for those investing in bitcoins for their portfolios, it should have a holding of at least 6% for optimal construction on your portfolio.

Other bitcoin experts such as Wences Casares, Chamath Palihapitiya, and John McAfee also offered their own brands of expertise on the cryptocurrency, with all three of them, among others, predicting the rising value of bitcoin in the coming years. With that in mind, the trust that numerous experts have can be essential for your consideration in including bitcoins in your investment portfolio.

Bitcoin is a Viable Option for Investments

Countries like the Philippines, US, Venezuela, Turkey, Italy, India, South Africa, Nigeria, and Argentina are currently some of the many countries that have been undergoing major economic issues, with Venezuela being a massive casualty with an inflation rate of over 25,000%. Because of the various issues that are plaguing these countries, many of them are now looking at bitcoin as a reliable alternative for people to use for future transactions since their national money has virtually no value.

This is something to consider if you’re planning to invest in different companies from different countries, or rather if you’ve already invested in international companies. While it can be a good opportunity for investors to add to their portfolio nonetheless, one can never be too sure about the economic structure of such.

Bitcoins Have a Steady Rise in the Market

One thing that’s good about bitcoins is its steady rise in the market. As of September 2018, Bitcoin has been up 2.82% in a 24-hour period, marking its slow, yet steady rise in the cryptocurrency market.

This is a great thing to consider when you’re looking for diversitySet featured image in your investment portfolio as not only can this ensure (though not always) greater chances for profit for investors, this can also make a great addition to your investment portfolio as a whole.

Investing in Bitcoin is a Challenge

All in all, investing in Bitcoin can be a challenge to many investors. Every investor taking the leap must always be up-to-date with current affairs, trends, and news that can affect the crypto world, not to mention having to study up on cryptocurrency as a whole.

Key Takeaway

When it comes to diversity of an investment portfolio, there are a lot of other things to consider. With these three factors in mind, getting to buy bitcoins, as well as buying tether and other forms of cryptocurrencies, for your investment portfolio can be a great opportunity nonetheless as you, as an investor, can get the chance to relish in the benefits that the cryptocurrency can provide, whether it be for diversification for your portfolio, other forms of investments, or for maximum profit on your end!

Investors are rapidly losing confidence in the government’s ability to secure a good Brexit deal, according to new data from Assetz Capital’s Q3 Investor Barometer.

The peer-to-peer business lender carries out its Investor Barometer every quarter, a survey of its 29,000-strong investor community.

The Investor Barometer has tracked Brexit sentiment since the start of 2018, and as the UK’s withdrawal gets closer, confidence of a positive outcome to the negotiations has dropped. In Q3, only 10% were ‘confident’ or ‘very confident’ of a good deal. This is down from 20% in Q2 and 21% in Q1.

Conversely, the number of ‘not confident’ or ‘not at all confident’ has continued to rise. The figure hit 90% in Q3, up from 80% in Q2 and 79% in Q1.

The results come following Chancellor of the Exchequer Phillip Hammond warned that a no-deal Brexit would lead to ‘large fiscal consequences’.

Stuart Law, CEO at Assetz Capital said: “Whatever optimism our investors had around the Brexit negotiations is slipping away. The view from the Assetz Capital community is that there’s significant economic pain on the horizon.

“Post-withdrawal, it will be more important than ever that the whole alternative finance industry works hard to deliver for both investors and borrowers. It’s when the economy struggles that growth capital becomes even more scarce. Peer-to-peer lenders must stand up and support the country through this Brexit uncertainty.”

(Source: Assetz Capital)

Gold has long been known as a store of value to help investors weather turbulent financial markets. Below, Shaun Djie, Co-Founder and COO of Digix, explains why digital gold is a forward moving solution for everyone.

In recent years, it has also become far easier for the average individual to buy and sell gold. There are online bullion dealers and high-street shops selling gold, as well as exchange-traded funds for gold, which are effectively investment funds that track the price of gold.

However, while it’s now easier to purchase, the spread between what individuals pay for this asset and what dealers sell it for can be very big. This is especially true for small denominations of gold. Exchange traded funds overcome many of the associated complications of investing in gold but they tend to be more expensive than physical gold because of the inclusion of brokerage and management fees.

But for those interested in investing in gold and getting a better deal for it, the good news is an alternative to owning physical gold and relying on ETFs is emerging – thanks to blockchain technology.

Understanding blockchain’s potential

Blockchains are shared digital ledgers that record every transaction ever made on them. So physical assets like gold can be divided and represented by tokens, and blockchain technology can keep track of the ownership of those tokens.

Gold has become one of the first real-world assets to be tokenised and freely traded on the blockchain. With this comes a level of divisibility that hasn’t been seen before. Emerging gold ownership and trading protocols can ensure that tokens are minted on a proportional basis – so, for example, one token is equivalent to one gram of a physical gold held in a secure vault.

In some systems, the delivered gold is subject to verifications at the point of deposit into the vault, as well as at quarterly reviews by independent auditors. Hence, there should never be more tokens created than the total weight of physical gold bullion backing them.

Simplicity and liquidity

In this way, gold-backed tokens not only bring divisibility but also an easy, reliable and secure way to own and trade gold. Liquidity would increase, which would be good news for current gold investors and any prospective investors who may have been put off by an inability to access small denominations or by the fees that ETFs charge.

For existing investors, more profits from gold can end up in their pocket too. Buying a gram of gold through leading smart asset companies on the Ethereum blockchain costs under US$40, where as the retail price for a 1g bar hovers around the US$77 mark.

That’s because, by removing the physical and administrative costs of creating 1g gold bars, tokenised gold can get as close to the the spot price of gold than any method – regardless of the size of purchase.

Stability that investors can rely on

While these benefits will sound appealing to many investors, some may point to the historical volatility of cryptocurrencies as a sign that they won’t appeal to gold investors’ needs. It’s certainly true that the huge speculative bubble in virtual currencies has led to immense volatility.

However, gold-backed tokens are totally different to existing cryptocurrencies because of the bridge they have to the real world asset. To build confidence in crypto markets, gold-backed tokens are needed. They can also diversify portfolios and be used as collateral for lending and other financial products.

For existing investors, gold forming a central part of the crypto economy would be beneficial, pushing up the demand for the metal even further. These investors have always been able to see the value of their investment in this asset. However, through the tokenisation of physical gold, they can benefit from the liquidity, divisibility and security of these digital assets just as much as entirely new investors can.

New research from eFront shows that while the 1990s might be thought of as a “golden era” for venture capital, returns figures do not back this assumption up.

• Conventional wisdom has it that in the decade 1990, returns of venture capital funds were higher and cash was returned faster.
• The decade 1990 can indeed be singled out for its shorter time-to-liquidity, but not for its higher returns.
• The 1990s recorded an average time-to-liquidity for US early-stage VC funds of 3.62 years, compared with 6.7 years for the 2000s.
• Returns (TVPI), meanwhile, stood at 1.1x for the 1990s and 1.57x for the 2000s.
• The figures for European early-stage funds were similar, with holding periods of 3.7 years and 6.9 years in the 1990s and 2000s respectively. Returns were just 0.96x for the 1990s and 1.56x for the following decade.
• A more detailed analysis shows that there are in fact three successive and distinct periods in the decade of 1990, which marks a transition for venture capital.

Analysis

Were the 1990s the golden decade of venture capital? Listening to veteran investors of that time, it would be easy to conclude positively. In collective the memory, that decade remains associated with high VC fund performance, meteoritic entrepreneurial successes and a certain ease of doing business. Fast-forward to today, and VC fund managers complain today of high levels of competition and high valuations of start-ups.

Conventional wisdom is right on one point: that the 1990s can be singled out. But this is because of a much shorter time-to-liquidity that seen before or since. The 1990s recorded an average time-to-liquidity for US early-stage VC funds of 3.62 years, compared with 6.7 years for 2001-2010. However, overall performance for the decade does not look particularly good, with funds returning just 1.1x, compared with 1.57x for the 2000s. If a few vintage years made a strong impression on investors, the overall decade appears as fairly poor in terms of pooled average total value to paid-in (TVPI).

Figure 1 – Performance and time-to-liquidity of US early-stage VC funds, by decade

Beyond the aggregate figures, a more detailed analysis by vintage years shows that there is a tale of three successive and distinct periods in 1990: one with high TVPIs and short time-to-liquidity in 1993-1996, then one with low TVPIs and short time-to-liquidity in 1997-1998 and a final one with negative returns and long time-to-liquidity in 1999-2000. Therefore, more than a golden decade, the 1990s appear as a period of transition.

The following decade is more consistent over time both in terms of seeing fairly high TVPIs of 1.5 to 2.5x (except in 2001) and a longer time-to-liquidity (4.8 to 6.4 years).

Could this be a US-centric phenomenon? Looking at Figure 3, the answer is negative: the picture is rather similar for Western European VC funds. European early-stage funds saw time to liquidity of 3.7 years and 6.9 years in the 1990s and 2000s respectively, while returns were just 0.96x for the 1990s and 1.56x for the following decade.

Figure 3 – Performance and time-to-liquidity of Western European early-stage VC funds, by decade 

Thibaut de Laval, Chief Strategy Officer of eFront, commented:

“A few exceptional years have marked a decade and an asset class. The venture capital boom years of the decade 1990 have left investors with the wish to see them happen again. The analysis of that decade has shown that indeed it was unusual, not because of overall high TVPIs but mostly due to shorter time-to-liquidity.

“Said differently, the vintage years associated with the subsequent stock market crash have wiped out a significant part the overall outperformance of the decade. In that sense, wishing to return to the ‘golden years’ bears the risk of calling as well for a performance bust. The following decade, still partially in the making, contrasts with the 1990s in surprisingly positive ways.”

(Source: eFront)

Assetz Capital investors are predicting the worst economic quarter of the year, according to the Q3 Investor Barometer.

Last quarter, the peer-to-peer lending platform surveyed its 29,000-strong investor base. When asked ‘how will the economic situation impact you in the next three months’, only 9% thought it would be positive, while 40% thought it would be negative.

This compares poorly to Q1 (13% positive, 36% negative) and Q2 (10% positive, 31% negative), as the potential future relationship models with the EU post-Brexit start to become clearer.

Stuart Law, CEO at Assetz Capital said: “While the government may release statistics that claim the economy is in good health, our investors are not as bullish. In fact, with confidence fading in the government’s ability to secure a good Brexit deal, our investment community is expecting this quarter to be the worst of the year.

“Until this uncertainty is lifted, we expect that conventional means of business investment will continue to stall, breeding further concern for the economy. Although peer-to-peer lending has inherent risks, it now represents the best opportunity for SMEs to secure growth capital, drive employment and give the economy a shot in the arm.”

(Source: Assetz Capital Limited)

Nearly 50% of 2017’s Initial Coin Offerings are currently failing, and one serious factor in this lack of success comes from the lack of trust in a business. Investing in ICOs is risky. Little regulation results in a vulnerability to fraud, and is putting off people from contributing - and rightly so, why would you want to just throw away money?

With that said, ICOs can prove an incredible investment opportunity, with huge potential for growth starting at the pre-sale; and if a potential contributor has trust in a project, there is absolutely no reason for them not to invest.

So how can you earn investors’ trust? This week Tomislav Matic, CEO of Crypto Future, provides Finance Monthly with his top five ways to incite trust in potential investors.

1. Be transparent

One key factor in convincing others of your legitimacy is through being as transparent as possible. Of course, not every detail can be given away, but letting potential contributors understand the inner workings of your company can go a long way to showing them all the work being put into your ICO.

Being transparent develops a unique relationship with investors. Show them you align with legal compliance - you could even go as far as showing off clips of on-site testing; whatever it takes to show the world that you are genuine in your efforts, working hard to make this project a success - it goes much further than you might think.

2. Go social

On average, people spend 116 minutes of their day on social media - just under two hours checking what other people are doing. Only a fool would miss out on this opportunity for both exposure, and a chance to involve future contributors.

Use Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter - and other social media sites too - to give people regular updates on product details, blog posts, interviews, information; anything you can think of. Frequent updates through a channel that people will be checking regardless go a long way to making investors feel involved in the progression of the project, connected and valued - that extra insight only helps towards bridging that relationship.

3. Introduce your team

By now, contributors feel the platform is safe, they know the inner workings of your product, and they feel involved with the project; it’s time to show them the team behind it. It’s all well and good having a brilliant product, but if you’ve got someone running the ICO who isn’t capable of delivering it, how can an investor trust it?

Roll out the blogs, the interviews, the Q&As, and get their social media accounts active too. Does your CEO have an incredible track record of getting ICOs off the ground? Shout about it. And an inexperienced leadership team isn’t necessarily a bad thing either - you just need to show to contributors why they are in the position they hold.

4. Create an extensive whitepaper

Not everyone will go through the entire whitepaper from front to back, but having a detailed outline of everything to do with your project gives contributors access to any specific information they might need.

Having a strong, comprehensive whitepaper in place allows investors to complete their due diligence at their own leisure. It’s a recurring theme: access to information. The more access, the more allowance you give for trust to blossom.

5. Outlining a clearly defined roadmap

Actions speak louder than words, but if you’re showing future contributors exactly what you’re planning and how you’re going to implement that plan, and then following through on it, there is absolutely no reason for them to believe that you can’t continue in that vein.

Outlining your strategy is a brilliant way of proving that you follow up on promises, and if you can do it before the ICO even starts, even with the smallest steps, investors will be more inclined to put their faith in you once the sale has kicked off.

Building trust is by no means easy, but it is incredibly vital to aiding your ICO’s success. It can without doubt be the difference between an ICO that hits the ground running, and one that flops completely.

The process starts early, and requires a huge amount of time and effort - much like building trust face to face - but the rewards are tremendous.

Recently released HMRC data* shows that the money being invested in Innovative Finance ISAs (IFISAs) has increased by over 700% in the last year with six times more people now saving into an IFISA.

The amount of money now in IFISAs has risen from £36million in 2016-17 to over £290million in 2017-18. The data also shows that over 25,000 people opened IFISAs in the last 12 months. Just 5,000 accounts were open in 2016-17 and this rose to 31,000 in 2017-18. One of the reasons for this sharp rise may be due to the low return’s savers are getting from other types of accounts such as Cash ISAs and every day savings accounts.

Commenting on the data, Paul Sonabend Commercial Director of Relendex, a Peer-to-Peer lending exchange dedicated entirely to financing UK property, said: “IFISAs are giving savers the chance to earn high returns on their money. The interest rates offered on these products outstrip the rates offered by high-street lenders on traditional Cash ISAs which can be as low as 0.2%. With inflation running at 3.4%**, traditional savings accounts which are not matching the rate of inflation are losing money in real terms.

“IFISAs now offer savers sensible alternatives paying more than a cash ISAs, without the level of risks and volatility of Equity ISA’s. These returns are not magical, they are produced by taking the banks out of the picture and giving the lion’s share of the interest paid by borrowers directly to savers. For example, the Relendex Secured Portfolio ISA offers rates of up to 6% ensuring that savers are seeing real benefits from their hard-earned savings.”

The UK Government introduced the IFISA on 6th April 2016. The IFISA allows individuals to use some (or all) of their annual ISA investment allowance to lend funds through the growing Peer-to-Peer lending market, whilst receiving the tax-free benefits of ISAs.

The biggest risk to stock market investors right now is US Federal Reserve policy error - not a sharp bond market sell-off.

Tom Elliott, International Investment Strategist at deVere Group, is speaking out as financial markets have shown increasing nervousness in recent days.

Mr Elliott comments: “Investors in all assets can be forgiven for fearing a bond market sell-off, given the recent sharp increase in Treasury yields. Higher Treasury yields are likely to lift yields in other core government bond markets, increasing the risk-free rates that other assets have to compete against.

“But if the stock market rally is about to end, is it really going to be because bond investors become afraid of the growth and inflation risks of the strong US economy?

“This is, surely, not realistic given the modest inflation data.

“Fed chair, Jay Powell, has repeatedly made clear his nervousness of reading too much into the recent uptick in US wage growth, and the tightening labour market, which are often considered key determinates for inflation.

“Indeed, it is worth noting not only that September’s hourly wage growth, of 2.8% year-on-year, was actually lower than August’s 2.9%, but also that inflation expectations are broadly stable.

“The Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, the core PCE index, stands at just 2%.”

He continues: “With three more interest rate hikes expected next year, which would take the Fed’s target range to 2.75% – 3%, there is a growing risk not of inflation derailing the U.S economy, but Fed policy error whereby growth is harmed because of an overly-aggressive policy mix.

“This would include not only raising interest rates too fast, but also its quantitative tightening programme that is withdrawing $50bn a month from the U.S. economy, and so contributing to higher bond yields.”

Mr Elliott concludes: “Therefore, the risk to stock market investors comes not from a sharp bond market sell-off which raises the risk-free yields on Treasuries. It is from the Fed ignoring its chair’s own advice and tightening monetary policy faster than the American economy can stand.”

(Source: deVere Group)

As Bitcoin reaches its 10th year since its launch announcement by Satoshi Nakamoto, IW Capital has commissioned a national representative piece of research, from 2,007 respondents, exploring the UK’s attitudes to cryptocurrency as an investment opportunity opposed to traditional and alternative investments.

The data reveals that, fundamentally, Brits do not have enough information or knowledge on the topic of cryptocurrency. In fact, many have no knowledge about the subject whatsoever.

• Nearly 20 million Brits do not understand cryptocurrency at all
• 17.5 million people believe that the cryptocurrency bubble will burst
• Only 7% - 3.5 million - believe cryptocurrency is more valuable than traditional investments (i.e. stocks and shares)

Across the sample of investor and critical mass society, the enlightening body of data unveils the relevance of bitcoin and the wider cryptocurrency arena as an investment opportunity. Launched at a time dominated by the new-age investment form, its momentum filled rise to fame has gained global awareness, today’s research reveals however that the age of bitcoin is seemingly unsupported by the vast majority of money-minded Britain.

Londoner's Value Cryptocurrency Higher than Elsewhere in the UK

A fifth of Londoners believes that cryptocurrencies are more valuable than traditional investments, such as stocks and shares. This is higher than the North East (10%), South East (7%) and Yorkshire and Humberside (5%), which are the following regions that value cryptocurrency more. The South East (29%), Scotland (27%) and the South West (24%) are the largest traditionalists, believing that traditional investments are more valuable than cryptocurrency.

Trial and Error 

Despite a widespread dearth of knowledge surrounding this particular asset class, disconcertingly, one in 20 Brits - nearly three million - have invested in cryptocurrency without fully understanding it, with only 5% having taken advice from a financial adviser when investing in cryptocurrencies.

• Only 5% of those who have invested in cryptocurrency have made financial gains
• 11.5 million have failed to make a financial gain when investing in a cryptocurrency

Old Vs New

More than three times - 12 million - (23%) who have previously invested, prefer to invest in stocks and shares than in any form of cryptocurrency (7%). Equally, three times more prefer alternative investments - 10.5 million - (21%) than to cryptocurrencies (6%).

With only 18% of respondents believe stating that they have an understanding of cryptocurrency, over a quarter of those surveyed - 14 million - (27%) believe that SME investments are a more stable an investment vehicle investment than cryptocurrency and a further 23% value these traditional investments over cryptocurrency. Alternative investments also hold greater weight as over a fifth (21%) believe that they hold more value than cryptocurrencies.
Over a quarter of Britons (27%) hold the belief that cryptocurrencies are a less stable investment than SME investments, however, only 18% agree that they fully understand what cryptocurrency is. Among 18-34-year olds, this rises to a quarter (25%) who believe they fully understand compared to just 13% of those aged 55+.

Luke Davis, Founder, and CEO of IW Capital has responded to the survey results. "With so much advertising and airtime dedicated to cryptocurrencies, particularly over the past 12 months, it is shocking, but not surprising, to see so much confusion around the topic of cryptocurrency. To see that investments have been made without the proper financial advice and a lack of facts is very concerning. With so many high-profile celebrities and business people coming out and supporting cryptocurrency investments, I believe that we will continue to see confusion and a lack of information surrounding them.

It appears to be more accessible to invest into currencies these days, with e-currency and e-trading platforms easily accessible via smartphones and tablets, but there is a lack of information around other, more stable investments, such as SME investments, which can deliver a consistent return when advised upon by a qualified professional. Ambassadors have a responsibility to supply accurate and correct information to potential investments. Many treat cryptocurrency decisions like a bet in a bookmaker, rather than as a serious investment decision like it is.

There is a place for cryptocurrency investment, but there are so many other investment opportunities that are not taken advantage of. My major concern within cryptocurrency investment is the lack of transparency in the investment. There are so many great SME-based investments that have superb tax incentives to build a portfolio upon, but they are undersold against the allure of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as a viable investment for the first-time investor."

(Source: IW Capital)

New research reveals a UK technology market which has attracted the eye of US businesses and seen a huge increase in transactions, with acquisitions of UK technology companies up 386% in 2017 than there were in 2009).

Of the 247 UK companies to have exited into the US in 2017, almost a third (32.3%) of those were technology companies, followed by manufacturing, which has also seen an increasing interest from the US over the same period.

While technology has been one of the principle drivers of the UK M&A market in the mid-market, the results highlight there has also been a wider trend of increasing activity from US acquirers. Overall, the UK has seen the acquisition of companies below £1billion increase by 86% over the last decade (2009 to 2017), with sectors such as Business Services and Manufacturing having increased in the number of sales to US acquirers.

Commenting on the findings, Andy Hodgetts, Senior Corporate Finance Manager at Buzzacott said: “The UK’s technology landscape is changing dramatically and is far more active than it was just under a decade ago. Silicon Valley is no longer the sole proprietor for developing new innovations, the UK is a hotbed for talent, and in the US’ acquisitions of UK companies, they are gaining access to that talent pool.

Hodgetts continued: “There has been a lot of uncertainty around Brexit and what it means for the UK, which has left many businesses unsure as to when might be a good time for them to sell. What we are seeing however is that there are a number of opportunities and buyers out there, especially in the US. For UK companies that are planning on exiting, but have waited due to the uncertainty the UK faces, it is important to not just think about companies within the UK that might want to acquire the business, but explore internationally too as there are plenty of buyers available, whatever the sector.”

(Source: Buzzacott)

Saving and investing money are two completely different things. They each have a different purpose and play different roles in your life. You should make sure that you are clear on the concept before deciding which step to take on your financial journey to avoid stress and help towards meeting your financial goals.

It may seem like a simple question, but wondering whether you should save or invest will completely depend on your financial situation and what you want in life. So perhaps the best way to start is to work out the difference between saving and investing for, defining both concepts.

Saving

Saving involves you putting money into an account and adding to it regularly. Your capital will not be at risk and you have the chance to grow your money by earning interest on it. But there is a risk that the rate of interest paid on your money may not be higher than the rate of inflation and your money may not increase in value.

Savings are great to have as they are always available to access and can be used for many things such as emergencies or a down payment on a house. You can also set up savings accounts for major life events such as retirement and death. With the rising costs of funerals, for example, saving money for it now will help loved ones find a funeral director and pay for it without any stress or worry.

Pros: A savings account is easily accessible when you need money you can go to your bank and withdraw what you want. When you set aside money into a savings account, you’re not putting your funds at risk - a savings account is stable.

Cons: With low risk, comes low returns. Interest rates on savings accounts are lower than any other account. If you are planning on leaving the money in there for a long period of times, you may want to consider a different type of account with a higher interest rate.

Investing

Investing involves you allocating money for a long period of time into an investment, in the hope of making more money on it. When it comes to investing, there is no guarantee you’ll get your initial capital back, or make a profit. But you could end up growing your money, depending on how your investment performs.

Pros: When buying stock or another investment, you do so hoping that your investment will appreciate over time and earn you some money back. Stocks typically have the highest average return. However, they come higher risks. When looking to invest your money you have lots of choices too, from a classic car to a house.

Cons: Investing involves you allocating money for a long period of time into something that should gain in value, in the hope of making money on it. When it comes to investing there is no guarantee you’ll get your initial capital back, or make a profit. But you could end up growing your money, depending on how your investment performs.

Taking money from an investment is not as easy as withdrawing it from a savings account. While it’s best to invest for the long term, if you need the money and want to sell what you’ve invested in you need to wait for the funds to become available.

So whether you put the bulk of your money into a savings account or into an investment, it will depend on various factors and what suits your situation best. Both of them are important for overall financial security.