For almost three quarters (73%) of financials services leaders, customers are the main driving force behind their company’s digital transformation, however fear of failure is holding back the implementation of digital projects, with almost three quarters of financials services leaders put off by the costs of failed projects. This comes as no surprise, as seven-in-10 admit to cancelled projects in the last two years, according to Fujitsu’s Digital Transformation PACT Report.

“Financial services firms are under pressure from their customers to deliver greater speed, convenience and personalisation, as well as better customer services,” said Ian Bradbury, CTO Financial Services at Fujitsu UK & Ireland. “Digital transformation is certainly a key strategy in helping banks and insurers achieve this, however, despite the sector going from strength to strength, financial sector firms have undertaken unsuccessful projects and lost money. This has made them nervous about deploying new projects. But we feel that success can be born out of previous unsuccessful projects, as previous failures allow organisations to learn. In an ever-changing market, there is no such thing as permanent success. Organisations must continuously improve, learning from their mistakes along the way.”

Even though over four-in-five (87%) have a clearly defined digital strategy, almost three quarters (73%) admit that their digital transformation projects often aren’t linked to the overarching business strategy. But is this the sole reason UK financial services leaders can’t get to grips with their digital projects?

Realising a digital vision is not just about having the right technology. In order to successfully digitally transform, this research highlights four strategic elements businesses must focus on: People, Actions, Collaboration and Technology – the Digital PACT.

1. People

While admitting to a problematic skills gap – especially as 80% believe the lack of skills within the business is the biggest hindrance to addressing cybersecurity – it is encouraging to see that over nine-in-10 believe they have a culture of innovation within their organisation. Despite this believe, 87% believe that fear of failure is a hindrance to digital transformation projects. There is therefore a long way to go for financial services companies to truly transform their culture to thrive on innovation. As UK financial services firms are taking measures to increase their access to digital skills and expertise (93%), four-in-five believe attracting ‘digitally native’ staff will be vital to their firms’ success in the next three years, as well as turning towards targeted recruitment (72%) and apprenticeships (50%) to support digital transformation.

2. Actions

Although having the right processes, attitudes and behaviours within the organisation to ensure digital projects are successful are seen as the least important of the four key elements of digital transformation, 87% are taking specific measures to support collaboration on digital innovation and over two-in-five (43%) are creating networks for employees to share expertise across the business.

3. Collaboration

Over a quarter (28%) of UK financial services leaders believe collaboration is an important element in realising the company’s digital strategy. While almost four-in-five (78%) turn to technology experts for co-creation, 67% go as far as seeking consultancy and training from start ups and organisations outside their industry.

4. Technology

Many organisations are already leveraging new technology that will radically change the way they do business. A fifth of financial services leaders believe implementing technology will be the most important factor to realising their digital strategy, with cloud computing and big data and analytics playing a key role in helping drive the financial success of their organisations over the next 10 years.

Bradbury continues: “Historically, financial services firms have been cautious when it comes to innovation. They are working under strict regulations and the very nature of what they do, means that a radical digital transformation project could have a detrimental impact on people’s lives – for example, negatively impacting access to bank accounts or making insurance claims. But this shouldn’t hinder innovation across the sector. Quite the opposite – with the help of external expertise and willingness to implement digital transformation, we can be soon pleasantly surprised at a revamp of the industry. Change doesn’t always come naturally, but the financial sector understands what’s at stake, with 86% admitting that the ability to change will be crucial for the business’ survival in the next five years.”

(Source: Fujitsu)

Initial Coin Offerings are one of the most tempting investment options for those hoping to profit from the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency. However, the lack of regulation has allowed ICO investors to become targets of sneaky schemes.

Though ICOs have snowballed, with more than 750 being invested in during 2018 alone, the number of scams has also steadily risen, with more victims of fraud falling prey to cryptocurrency criminals.

Following Satis Group’s revelation that approximately 80% of 2017 ICOs were identified scams, new data from Fortune Jack has found that just ten of the most high-profile ICO scams have swindled $687.4 million from unsuspecting investors.

In fact, the notorious Pincoin and iFan scam stole $660 million, with an estimated 32,000 investors falling prey to the money-making plot from Modern Tech.

As cryptocurrency continues to dominate headlines, more investors are pouring cash into ICO schemes in the hope of turning a quick profit. And with more than 150 scams listed on popular website Deadcoins, it’s easy to see how inexperienced ISO investors are being suckered.

The losses have become so prevalent that the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched its own ISO scam in a bid to show investors how easy it is to set up such schemes.

The top ten most notorious ICO scams to date

Despite the SEC warning that ICOs “bring an increased risk of fraud and manipulation” due to the lack of regulation, the number of ICOs as well as the amount invested has increased over the past year.

In 2017 $6,240,046,555 was raised across 371 ICOs. However, in 2018 a staggering $20,074,423,238 has been raised across 789 ICOs to date.

This reveals a 222% increase in the amount raised in 2018 so far, compared to the full year of 2017. Additionally, there is a 113% increase in the number of ICOs in 2018 so far compared to 2017.

If Satis Group’s suggestion that almost 80% of 2017’s ICOs were identified scams is correct, 297 ICOs in 2017 may have been fraudulent. If this trend was to continue in 2018, 631 ICOs could be fraudulent.

Despite such shocking statistics, ICOs remain a relatively popular investment in 2018, with $20.1 billion being invested into ICOs so far.

The amount invested in ICOs in 2018 to date

So, what are the red flags that may alert you to an ISO scam? The following were present in the most high-profile incidents:

- Silence from companies when contacted by investors

- Lack of a whitepaper and inconsistencies on the ISO website

- Fake Linkedin Profiles of “the team” with stock images or stolen photos

- Any text humourous or otherwise outlining a scam

- Promise of fixed profit or guaranteed ROI

(Source: Fortune Jack)

New research from Haven Power, one of the UK’s largest business electricity suppliers, reveals two fifths of Financial Services firms think renewable energy is just a passing trend. A perception that is significantly higher than any other industry.

Despite scepticism, almost two thirds of businesses in the sector are keen to start selling energy back to the grid. The Financial Services industry is one of the greenest compared to others surveyed, with 41% stating they already had onsite battery storage facilities installed.

The survey of Utility Decision Makers in Financial Services showed the biggest barrier preventing them from implementing sustainable change was cost (44%), followed by uncertainty on both how to measure the impact and ROI (30%) and how to discuss with investors or senior management (26%).

Paul Sheffield, Chief Operating Officer at Haven Power, commented: “Despite a proportion of firms still seemingly sceptical about the future of renewables, it’s encouraging to see that many are implementing positive changes. Understanding of renewable energy and its benefits varies greatly from sector to sector. We believe that every industry needs to start making sustainable changes to help reduce carbon emissions and embrace cleaner energy.”

When asked to list whose responsibility it is to lower carbon emissions, energy suppliers were cited top (48%), ahead of the Government (47%) and manufacturers (44%). Additionally, almost half (46%) strongly agree it is the energy providers’ responsibility to educate decision makers on the different types of energy available.

Paul Sheffield continued: “It’s imperative that organisations of all sizes across different industries work together with their energy provider to ensure the future of British business is low carbon. By moving beyond viewing energy as a commodity, we can help to drive sustainability and profitability. Here at Haven Power we are keen to help businesses understand the wider benefits of renewables.”

Haven Power is one of the UK’s largest business electricity suppliers, founded over ten years ago, it aims to help businesses control spend, manage risk and boost sustainability by using renewable electricity, energy efficiency and bespoke energy solutions.

(Source: Haven Power)

A study from Dun & Bradstreet recently revealed that while finance leaders remain tasked with business profitability, their remit has expanded to include the sharing of data across the organisation and management of risk.

The Risk Revolution found the top challenge for finance leaders today is monitoring risks within a business’ customer, supplier, or partner base (38%). The second biggest concern for finance leaders was found to be forecasting or predicting risk, while the third was growing profitability.

When it comes to managing risk, data is an invaluable insight for businesses. However, according to the study, 60% of finance leaders said that their data currently exists in organisational silos, with over half reporting difficulty sharing, linking and using data to drive their risk management strategies and are unable therefore to effectively harness the data to mitigate and manage business risk.

Commenting on the report, Tim Vine, Head of European Trade Credit at Dun & Bradstreet said: “A changing business environment, coupled with political and economic uncertainty, is making it increasingly challenging for finance leaders to manage risk effectively. Data-driven tools can uncover valuable insights to inform strategic decisions and drive business performance, but our report shows that adoption of these tools is still relatively low. Finance leaders who are able to leverage data can help their organisation navigate uncertainties in the market, manage risks and grow profitability.”

(Source: Dun & Bradstreet)

The Enterprise Investment Scheme Association (EISA) has released a national and investor representative piece of research, gauging whether the British public and its investors feel that they will be wealthier in a post-Brexit UK, and how they feel the negotiations have gone.

With the date that Britain leaves the EU edging ever closer, the Enterprise Investment Scheme Association (EISA) has launched The Brexit Wealth Index 2018. Based on research conducted across a sample of 2007 respondents - of which - 1,122 were nationally representative investors, the data outlines the wealth creation opportunities available to them post-Brexit. Providing anecdotal and quantitative analysis as to whether the country will be richer after leaving the European Union, the survey specifically questions whether they feel their individual wealth will and has increased after the decision to leave was made.

Three in 10 British investors - 8.75 million - believe that securing a good deal with the European Union will be crucial to their continuing investments into UK SMEs. This is opposed to 5.75 million investors who do not agree that a good deal will affect their investments into SMEs in the future. British investors - 12.5 million of them (43%) - believe that the Government's actions affect their investment decisions more than ever before. This is opposed to four million (14%) who do not believe this to be the case. Moreover, 13 million investors believe that Brexit will not make them wealthier. This amounts to 44% of British investors, versus a fifth (19%) who believe that Brexit will make them wealthier. Of the wider sample, half of British investors - 14.5 million - believe that their wealth has not increased since the referendum decision in June 2016, while 5.5 million do believe that their wealth has increased since the vote to leave the European Union was made.

• 17 million (59%) do not think the Government is doing a good job in securing a deal for the UK’s financial services sector
• 12.5 million (43%) of British investors feel that the Government's actions now affect their investment decision more now than ever before
• 8.75 million (30%) believe that securing a good deal with the EU will be crucial to their continuing investments into UK SMEs
• Half of British investors – 14.5 million – have seen their wealth decrease since the referendum decision
• 13 million (44%) do not believe that Brexit will make them wealthier
• Nearly half (45%) - 13 million – believe that there will be a Brexit deficit which will make the UK poorer after March 2019
• Four in 10 – 11.5 million – believe that the Brexit deficit will make the UK poorer after March 2019
• A third of British investors – 10 million – feel that there will be more opportunities to invest into SMEs in post-Brexit Britain
• Four in 10 – 11.5 million British investors – feel that there will be more opportunity for wealth creation and entrepreneurship post-Brexit
• A third of British investors - 10 million – believe that there will be a Brexit dividend which will make the UK richer after March 2019.

Overwhelmingly, 17 million British investors do not think that the Government is doing a good job in securing a deal for the UK’s financial services sector. Six in 10 (59%) of respondents believe this to be true.

A third of British investors (32%) - 9.5 million – do not believe that there will be more opportunity for wealth creation and entrepreneurship post-Brexit. However, nearly four in 10, (39%) - 11.5 million – do. This sentiment continues as 10 million British investors believe that there will be more opportunities to invest into SMEs in a post-Brexit Britain while seven million disagree.

A third (34%) of respondents believe that there will be a Brexit dividend which will make the UK richer after March 2019. This amounts to 10 million British investors. However, 11.5 million – 39% of respondents – disagree with this. In fact, when asked, I feel that there will be a Brexit deficit which will make the UK poorer after March 2019, 45% of respondents – 13 million – agreed, while just over a quarter (27%) disagreed.

Mark Brownridge, Director General of the Enterprise Investment Scheme Association (EISA), commented on the results of the survey: “It is clear that from this research that British investors feel that Brexit has not made them wealthier to date, and they do not believe that it will in the future either. Moreover, they feel that our Government does not have their back, and in fact, is contributing to the negative sentiment surrounding Brexit. The fact that so many investors feel this way is going to have a knock-on impact on the rest of the country and the economy.

However, there is some positivity, with many feeling that there will be great opportunities for wealth creation, entrepreneurship, and investment into SMEs in a post-Brexit Britain. We must remain optimistic yet cautious, we need to ensure that investors have the confidence to continue to look to UK SMEs as a viable investment, and also ensure that there is enough capital for investors to reinvest back into UK businesses.’

(Source: EISA)

Online research from Equifax, the consumer and business insights expert, reveals a lack of awareness of banking options among Brits. When presented with a list of digital banks 60% hadn’t heard of any of the brands and only 20% would opt for a challenger bank if opening a new account today.

The survey, conducted with Gorkana, showed 44% of Brits would choose a traditional bank, and when choosing which brand to bank with, they prioritise good customer service (41%), ease of managing money via a good app or online service (34%), and availability of a physical branch (32%). Media influence was least important; only 3% of people factor news stories about a bank into their decision.

Good customer service also topped the list of priorities for people who would choose a challenger bank (31%), followed by incentives such as a joining fee (28%) and a good app or online service (27%). Friends or family using the bank was the least important factor – just 5% of respondents would take this into consideration.

People who would opt for a challenger bank appear to be more value conscious; one fifth (20%) said better rates when using their card or withdrawing cash abroad would appeal to them, compared to 12% of people who would use a traditional bank. Over a quarter (27%) rate more competitive rates, for example on overdraft fees or loans services a contributory factor when choosing a challenger bank, versus 19% for traditional banks.

Jake Ranson, Banking and Financial Institution expert and CMO at Equifax Ltd, says: “Challenger and digital banks have been making their mark in the banking sector bringing attractive, consumer friendly services to market, yet many consumers are still unaware of these brands. The government has taken action to increase competition in the sector but there’s still a lot of work to do to encourage consumers to fully explore the options available to them and make informed decisions on selecting or retaining accounts.

“Open Banking is underway and is a huge advance for consumers. Services are coming to market that will help people get better value from banks, for example identifying sign-up incentives or better rates tailored to their needs. The next step is for the industry to work together to increase consumer awareness of the value Open Banking unlocks.”

(Source: Equifax)

According to the latest YouGov debt research commissioned by Equifax, 15% of UK adults have missed a payment on a credit card or short term loan at some point. Almost a third (32%) of UK adults with a credit card admit that, in a typical month, they don’t pay off their credit cards debts in full, with over half (52%) of these saying it’s because they can’t afford the full monthly balance. With the net lending to individuals in the UK increasing by £9.68 million a day in March 2018 and an average debt to income ratio per adult in the UK at 114.4% as of May 2018 , Equifax asks the question: is all debt bad?

Household debt has been on the increase over the past few years, fuelled by squeezed wages and rising inflation. Last year alone the total credit card debt of households across the UK stood at £70 billon by November – equating to an average debt of £2574.00 per household. Whilst using credit can be useful for various reasons, there is a tipping point where the borrowing can turn into unmanageable debt. If someone can no longer afford to repay their debt they may have to opt for an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA) or even declare themselves bankrupt.

Lisa Hardstaff, consumer credit expert at Equifax, comments: “According to our YouGov research, 40% use credit cards for day-to-day spending, which isn’t strictly a ‘good’ or ‘bad’ thing. But 13% of respondents have gone into their overdraft limit without approval from the lender, which could mean incurring extra charges and fees. Our infographic aims to help consumers see the different kinds of debt and recognise the risks, whilst outlining steps they can take to regain control of their finances.

“Not all debt is bad. If it’s managed properly and paid off, loans and credit cards can help people make plans and deal with unexpected events and emergencies. However, it’s vital that people understand the basics of budgeting, otherwise borrowing can spiral out of control. The first step to budgeting is understanding what’s coming in in terms of wages, benefits and other income. Individuals also need to take stock of their outgoings, including bills, pensions, loans and daily purchases, such as coffee or clothes. By subtracting their total spending from their total income, individuals will be able to see if there’s a shortfall and make positive changes.”

(Source: Equifax)

Three quarters of finance decision makers within UK businesses have admitted that their company could be susceptible to fraud because of poor accounts payable systems, according to a new report.

And 70% of finance decision makers also admitted that a failure to implement robust purchase order processing within their company was also putting them at severe risk from fraud.

In fact according to the ‘Changing trends in the purchasing processes of UK businesses’ report commissioned by document managing, accounts payable and purchasing solution provider Invu, less than a quarter (24%) of decision makers are ‘completely confident’ that they could prevent or detect fraud with their current systems.

The risk from fraud is also not limited by company size, according to the research, with 25% of large businesses and 30% of small companies harbouring some concerns about fraud due to weak processes and checks.

“Although we’ve seen a slight reduction in the amount of financial decision makers concerned about fraud, it is clear that concerns remain high within Britain’s business community and that not enough is being done to protect companies from becoming victims of fraud,” said Ian Smith, GM and Finance Director at Invu.

“Fraud is a huge problem for any business, with the results being potentially fatal. Automated processes, which can monitor purchase and payment processes, go a long way to prevent and detect these issues, but they are clearly not being deployed enough within UK businesses.”

(Source: Invu)

The latest research from national audit, tax and advisory firm Crowe Clark Whitehill, together with the University of Portsmouth’s Centre for Counter Fraud Studies (CCFS), reveals a national fraud pandemic totalling £110 billion a year. For context, that figure would build more than 110 Wembley Stadiums, or cover the annual budget for every single local authority in England combined. Put differently, the figure would cover the UK’s Brexit divorce bill almost three times over, or cover the salaries of 4.8 million nurses for a year.

‘The Financial Cost of Fraud 2018’ estimates that the UK economy could be boosted by £44 billion annually if organisations step up efforts to tackle fraud and error.

Globally, fraud is costing £3.24 trillion each year, a sum equal to the combined GDP of the UK and Italy, or enough to build more than 3,000 Wembley Stadiums.

The report, which is the only one of its kind, draws on 20 years of extensive global research from 40 sectors, where the total cost of fraud has been accurately measured across expenditure totalling £15.6 trillion.

Since 2008, there has been a startling 49.5% increase in average losses with businesses losing an average of 6.8% of total expenditure. Driven by technological advances and increasing digitisation, businesses now face a threat which is growing in scale and mutating in complexity.

Fraud is the last great unreduced business cost. Included in the report are examples where fraud has been accurately measured, managed and losses minimised, including a major mining company which reduced losses due to procurement fraud by over 51% within a two-year period, equating to USD 20 million at a time when commodity prices were falling.

Insurance fraud is an another sector to look into. It is happened by changing the beneficiaries. A proper investigation can minimize the vast effect. When any individual is getting life insurance over 75 years, the particular company must go through all the original documentation and proper channels.

Jim Gee, Head of Forensic & Counter Fraud at Crowe Clark Whitehill, comments: “The threat of fraud is becoming increasingly like a clinical virus – it is ever-present and ever-evolving. The bad news is that digitalisation of information storage, and process complexity, coupled with the pace of business change, have created an environment where fraud has thrived, grown and continued to mutate. The better news is that there are examples where organisations have measured and minimised fraud like any other business cost and greatly strengthened their finances.”

“In the current climate, to not consider the financial benefits of making relatively painless reductions in losses to fraud and error is foolhardy. The message to all organisations is measure, mitigate and manage fraud, or your bottom line will continue to suffer.”

Mark Button, Director of the Centre for Counter Fraud Studies at the, University of Portsmouth, adds: “This research shows that the most accurate measurement of fraud in organisations continues to show an upward trend. Many organisations are losing significant amounts to fraud and much more can be done to reduce losses.”

“Organisations could do much more to enhance prevention through a number of measures such as effective vetting of new staff, investing in data analytics and developing an anti-fraud culture.”

(Source: Crowe Clark Whitehill)

RiskIQ, the global leader in digital threat management, recently released an infographic mapping and profiling the global cryptocurrency mining landscape, which has swelled in size due to the rush by companies and threat actors alike to capitalise on cryptocurrency's skyrocketing valuation.

The infographic is based on data collected by RiskIQ's web crawling infrastructure, which downloads and analyses website content to identify the individual technical components that load when rendered to detect cryptocurrency miners across the Internet. The research highlights the influx of revenue-generating miners in domains in the Alexa top-10,000 and analyses their attributes, such as prevalence, longevity and associated infrastructure.

Since these miners require an expensive amount of computing power — Fundstrat reported that the cost of mining a single Bitcoin reached about $8,038 and the costs of mining other coins are not far behind — actors often source it from unwitting users. To do so, they take advantage of the fact that security teams lack visibility into all the ways that they can be attacked externally and struggle to understand what belongs to their organisation, how it’s connected to the rest of their asset inventory and what potential vulnerabilities are exposed to compromise.

While some brands capitalise by running cryptocurrency mining scripts in the background of their sites to leverage the computers of their visitors legally, threat actors exploit this blind spot to hack vulnerable sites or spin up fake, illegitimate websites to siphon money, often with typosquatting domains and fraudulent branding. RiskIQ reported back in February that an upwards of 50,000 total websites have been observed using Coinhive in the past year–many of them likely without the original owner’s knowledge.

"In the case of cryptocurrency mining scripts, organisations must be able to inventory all the third-party code running on their web assets and be able to detect instances of threat actors leveraging their brand on illegitimate sites around the Internet,” said Adam Hunt, chief data scientist at RiskIQ. “Threat actors realise the lack of visibility these organisations have and are targeting it accordingly.”

The report found that threat actors leveraging domains or subdomains that belong, or appear to belong, to major brands, trick people into visiting their sites running cryptocurrency mining scripts to monetize their content.

(Source: RiskIQ)

The impact of blockchain within the financial services industry could be significantly delayed by the damaging PR currently associated with cryptocurrencies, new research suggests.

Insight gathered in a report by international law firm Gowling WLG reveals that financial services experts are fearful that if the negative headlines surrounding the likes of Bitcoin impacts industry opinion about blockchain software, it will perpetuate the common confusion between the two.

The report, entitled 'The ultimate disruptor – how blockchain is transforming financial services', states that an estimated US$2.1 billion will be spent on blockchain solutions[1] during 2018 and, by 2021, levels are expected to reach US$9.2 billion. In order for the system to reach these levels of growth and its benefits to be realised, it's essential for businesses to understand the capabilities of blockchain and other distributed ledger technology (DLT) beyond Bitcoin.

Dean Elwood, CEO of blockchain company Umony and contributor to the report, said: “Bitcoin is creating so much noise, much of it negative, that the genuinely useful and practical side of blockchain is getting buried. I think there is a real pressure on the industry and people like me, to make sure that everyone really understands the difference between blockchain and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin."

The report features insight from specialists including NEX Exchange, Blockchain Hub, BTL Group and AgriLedger.

Many of the contributors believe that the development of blockchain technology will happen much faster if the industry collaborates and regulators are involved in the development process. This is because the very nature of DLT revolves around sharing information, not only internally, but also with customers and, in many cases, with competitors.

David Brennan, partner and co-chair of Gowling WLG's global tech team, said: "The business community has been quick to grasp the numerous opportunities blockchain solutions afford, but the key challenge will be communicating its significance to both the public and policymakers. Collaboration between governments and the private sector is key in order to facilitate widespread acceptance and adoption of the technology."

The firm's research also suggests that the appropriate industry regulators need to catch-up with the technological developments within blockchain and DLT, yet the majority of those interviewed do not believe that the technology itself requires regulation.

Andrew Gardiner, founder and CEO of Property Moose, said: "Cryptocurrencies need regulating, absolutely, 100%. But you can't regulate blockchain itself. It's just a piece of tech. For example, do you regulate Microsoft Word or Google for emails? They all have to be ISO compliant, so you’ll have industry standards, but these are not regulation.”

For a full overview of the research conducted with financial services experts, including insight on who will be affected by blockchain, the opportunities and threats facing the technology and the level of investment now going into blockchain development, see Gowling WLG's white paper 'The ultimate disruptor – how blockchain is transforming financial services'.

(Source: Gowling WLG)

[1] 1 Worldwide Semiannual Blockchain Spending Guide, International Data Corporation, 2018.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) cryptocurrency review will be one of the most impactful regulatory reviews in modern times and will shape the burgeoning crypto market for years to come. The UK regulator’s proactive and cautious approach must be welcomed.

This observation from Nigel Green, founder and chief executive of deVere Group, comes as the UK’s financial services and markets regulator has confirmed it will publish its review of cryptocurrencies in the third quarter this year.

Mr Green, whose firm launched deVere Crypto, a cryptocurrency exchange app earlier this year, comments: “The highly anticipated FCA cryptocurrency review is set to be one of the most impactful and far-reaching regulatory reviews in modern times for two key reasons.

“First, because of the sheer numbers of people it will directly affect.  There’s been incredible growth of the cryptocurrency market in recent years. This growth can be expected to soar further and quicker over the next decade as more and more investors pile into the likes of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin and Dash, and as adoption by businesses and organisations further increases.

“And second, because the FCA is one of the world’s most influential and respected financial regulators.  As such, it can be expected to help shape and define the thinking and policies of regulators globally, the majority of which in the major economies are now also carefully looking at the crypto space.”

He continues: “In our increasingly tech-driven, digital age, cryptocurrencies are here to stay; they simply can no longer be ignored.

“Therefore, the FCA’s proactive approach towards the crypto market must be welcomed as it will help protect investors and tackle illicit activity and unscrupulous firms.

“I expect the regulator to issue warnings and this caution should also be championed as these digital assets remain highly speculative and the market relatively new.”

In its business plan for the financial year ahead, the FCA said the review was part of a taskforce with the Treasury and The Bank of England.

The watchdog noted that cryptocurrencies themselves do not fall within its regulatory remit, but "some models of use or packaging cryptocurrencies bring them within our perimeter, making the landscape complex".

The deVere CEO concludes: “The FCA cryptocurrency review will fundamentally shape this market that now, thanks to its exponential growth, needs a robust regulatory framework.

“It is right that firms operating within the crypto sector should comply with applicable FCA rules and expect to come under the regulator’s scrutiny.”

(Source: deVere Group)