Still, there are countless success stories of humble immigrants coming to the US with not much more than their dreams (and a hard work ethic), beating the odds, and becoming millionaires (and in many cases, billionaires). Elon Musk of Tesla is one of the more recent examples, but there are thousands of other immigrants who came to the US, put in the work, and achieved their dreams.
So then, how does one start the process of becoming a millionaire? What are some of the nuances of the US economy that immigrants need to be aware of? Should you invest in real estate? What about the stock market, or its less-than-stable cousin cryptocurrency?
Whether you’re looking for tips on forming an investment strategy, want to learn more about how the US economy works, or simply need some advice on saving money, we have you covered. Below we cover everything you’ll need to be prepared for the process of becoming a millionaire in the US.
Million Dollar Saving Strategies
Believe it or not, most people have the ability to save up to a million dollars in their lifetime. Even if you’re not making a six-figure salary, you can easily employ some basic saving strategies to stretch your dollars into a million (over several years, of course).
With that being said, there are a few major variables that can affect how long it will take you to save (up to) a million dollars. These variables are listed below:
- What your annual revenue is (i.e. how much money you earn per year)
- What your annual expenses are
- How much money you’re able to save on a monthly/yearly basis
- What the growth rate of your investment(s) is
- What your savings rate is (i.e. the percentage you’re saving relative to your income)
The majority of financial planners in the US recommend saving at least 10 to 15% of your annual income. If at all possible, and you want to increase your savings rate, you should try to up that percentage (at least a little bit). Saving as much as possible, cutting costs when it makes sense, and living frugally (note: not cheaply) can all help to maximize your savings strategy.
Making Your First Million Will Be Difficult: Prepare Yourself
Lots of people have the quintessential romantic notion that they’ll work hard for a few years, meet the right people, the stars will align, etc., and that making their first million will somehow “just happen.” However, the reality of the situation is that making your first million dollars is almost always an uphill battle.
Lots of people have the quintessential romantic notion that they’ll work hard for a few years, meet the right people, the stars will align, etc., and that making their first million will somehow “just happen.” However, the reality of the situation is that making your first million dollars is almost always an uphill battle.
Luckily, though, that battle really only applies for the first million. As you should know by now, it takes money to make money (and having a million dollars to invest in your business ideas/investments makes it a lot easier to increase your revenue). There are tens of millions of millionaires in the US, and many of those are immigrants.
Indian-born immigrants account for many of these millionaires. But millionaires can come from anywhere and achieve their wealth through different methods, which means that it’s possible for anyone to become a millionaire - you just need to understand that it will take a certain work ethic and a lot of financial savvy.
Note: If you’re an immigrant looking to start saving money, you should think about finding a side hustle (or two, or three). Most independently wealthy individuals amassed their wealth through hard work (i.e. not just working a basic 9 to 5). Jobs for Indians in the US can be found via countless online resources.
[ymal]
Quick Tips for Your First Million
Use some of the basic tips posted below to increase your chances of becoming a millionaire. Remember, becoming a millionaire in the US should be thought of as a journey, and emphasizing the actual process (rather than the result) is what will elevate your finances to the next level.
- Focus on finding investment opportunities to increase your annual revenue
- Increasing your number of revenue streams is vastly undervalued (and very important)
- Avoid taking on debt (even if it’s for business reasons)
- Live as frugally as possible (but don’t neglect your health or mental well-being)
- Constantly be learning and developing new skillsets
- Look for new employment opportunities and/or side hustles that can increase your revenue stream
- Save as much money as possible and then invest that money into emerging markets
Here's the story of how the country's largest bank got to where it is today.
Biographer of J.P. Morgan Jean Strouse, longtime bank analyst Mike Mayo and CNBC banking reporter Hugh Son help tell the story. You’ll learn about how Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton are part of the bank’s history, along with the first ATM, and the company’s position moving forward into the future of digital banking.
With the ongoing spat between the United States and China, which seems to be only getting uglier, Katina Hristova explores the history of trade wars and the lessons that they teach us.
Trade wars date back to, well, the beginning or international trade. From British King William of Orange putting steep tariffs on French wine in 1689 to encourage the British to drink their own alcohol, through to the Boston Tea Party protest when the Sons of Liberty organisation protested the Tea Act of May 10 1773, which allowed the British East India company to sell tea from China in American colonies without paying any taxes – 17th and 18th century saw their fair share of trade related arguments on an international level.
Boston Tea Party/Credit:Wikimedia Commons
Trade wars were by no means rare in the late 19th century. One of the most infamous examples of a trade conflict that closely relates to Donald Trump’s sense of self-defeating protectionism is the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act (formally United States Tariff Act of 1930) which raised the US already high tariffs and along with similar measures around the globe helped torpedo world trade and, as economists argue, exacerbated the Great Depression. As a response to US’ protectionism, nations across the globe began striking each other with an-eye-for-an-eye tariffs – countries in Europe put taxes on American goods, which, understandably, slowed trade between the US and Europe. As we all know, the Depression had an impact on virtually every country in the world – resulting in drastic declines in output, widespread unemployment and acute deflation. Even though most countries began to recover between 1932 and 1933, the world was hit by World War II shortly after that. In 1947, once the war was over, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) was established - in an attempt to regulate international trade, strengthen economic development and hopefully, avoid a second global trade war after the one from the 1930s.
Schoolchildren line up for free issue of soup and a slice of bread in the Depression/Credit:Flickr
Another more recent analogy from the past that could be applied to the current conflict between two of world’s leading economies, is the so-called ‘Chicken War’ of 1963. The duel between the US and the Common Market began when European countries, feeling endangered by US’ new methods of factory farming, imposed tariffs on US chicken imports. For American poultry farmers, the Common Market tariffs virtually meant that they will lose their rich export market in West Germany and other European regions. Their retaliation? Tariffs targeting European potato farmers, Volkswagen campers and French cognac. 55 years later, as the Financial Times reports, the ‘chicken tax’ on light trucks is still in place, predominantly paid by Asian manufacturers, and has resulted in enduring distortions.
President Trump may claim that ‘trade wars are good’ and that ‘winning them is easy’, but history seems to indicate otherwise. In fact, a closer look at previous examples of trade conflicts seems to suggest that there are very few winners in this kind of fight.
For now, all we can do is wait and see if Trump’s extreme protectionism and China’s responses to it will destroy the post-World War II trading system and result in a global trade war; hoping that it won’t.
With current trade ‘talks’ with China, the US in a not in a great position money wise. According to Congressional Budget Office the US is heading for an annual budget deficit of more than $1 trillion (£707bn) by 2020, on the back of tax cuts and higher public spending.
Although these measures may bring ease to the current economic climate, it’s predicted they will exacerbate long term debt. The Congressional Budget Office believes such debt could amount to similar historical depths, such as World War II and the financial crisis.
This week Finance Monthly asked the experts Your Thoughts on the prospects of long-term debt in the US, and here’s what you had to say.
Andy Scott, leading UK serial entrepreneur and property developer:
With growth and confidence at record highs, unemployment low, and at best guess being mid-point through the economic cycle, Trump should be fixing the roof of his house while the sun is shining for the benefit of his children's generation and beyond. The temptation to focus on voter incentives to win a second term in November 2020 and to try out his unproven trickle-down policies for the few, seems short sighted from the President.
With a trade war underway, it appears banking on increased growth and mass job creations from tax cuts, whilst not tightening the already loose belt elsewhere, and not paying as you go, seems at best optimistic and at worst, reckless.
Deficits are nothing new, having run one every year since 2002. However, what should concern those of us with hopefully 30-40 years left on planet Earth is that even the most upbeat forecasts - taking into account no impact from any external factors (which seems highly unlikely given the confrontational leadership style) - show that not only are we heading for the trillion dollar deficits, but they are likely here to stay, and become the norm over the next decade. A legacy surely no one wants to be remembered by?
The US should think more long term otherwise the next generation will be burdened with more debt meaning lower growth, more tax, reduced services, higher inflation and ultimately fewer employment opportunities.
Josh Saul, Investment Manager, The Pure Gold Company:
Whilst there are clear and obvious benefits to having tax cuts with higher spending such as driving economic growth over the short-term, the question we should ask is, at what cost? the problem is that we are kicking the can down the road.
The Pure Gold Company has seen a 74% increase in US nationals investing in gold this year compared to the same period last year citing fears that escalating US debt will in the long run make the US and it’s economy vulnerable to fiscal shock. Our clients are concerned that given the high debt to GDP ratio, the US may have problems paying back its loans and this could increase the interest that the US will have to pay for the amplified possibility of default. The issue here is that the US having to pay more interest further accelerates the debt problem and with the dollar in the firing line – repeat problems like the current trade war with China put the US on the back foot. Our clients who are currently purchasing gold are concerned that over the next 20 years the social security trust fund won’t cover retirement benefits and the US will have to raise taxes and curtail benefits in order to cover various short-term monetary requirements. Incidentally this notion of escalated debt has doubled since 1988 and if you look at the gold price – that’s increased by 200%.
Our clients do not necessarily look at their investment having grown by 200% but instead it takes more currency to purchase the same ounce of gold. Therefore, our clients purchase gold to maintain their dollar’s purchasing power and with the US debt being the highest in the world they are not merely looking at the next 4 years but instead the next 10 – 20 years.
We would also love to hear more of Your Thoughts on this, so feel free to comment below and tell us what you think!
March started off with a bang when US President Donald Trump announced that his administration will impose steep tariffs on imported steel and aluminium in order to boost domestic manufacturing, saying that the action would be ‘the first of many’. This has brought about threats of retaliation by a number of the main US allies and the fear that Trump’s extreme protectionism may destroy the post-World War II trading system and result in a global trade war. Claiming that other countries are taking advantage of the US, the 45th President seems confident about the prospects of a global trade war, tweeting: ‘Trade wars are good, and easy to win’ a day after his initial announcement. Although the tariffs are stiff, they are considerably small when seen in the context of US economy at large. However, the outrage that his decision has fuelled and the fact that China has already taken steps to hit back signal global hostility and economic instability.
The Response
Donald Trump’s decision from the beginning of March was followed by a chain of events, including the EU publishing a long list of hundreds of American products it could target if the US moves forward with the tariffs, the US ordering new tariffs on about $50 billion of Chinese goods and China outlining plans to hit the United States with tariffs on more than 120 US goods. In an attempt to soften the blow, the White House announced that it will grant exemption to some allies, including Canada, Mexico, the European Union, Australia, Argentina, Brazil and South Korea. Trump gave them a 1 May deadline to work on negotiating ‘satisfactory alternative means’ to address the ‘threat to the national security of the United States’ that the current steel and aluminium imports imposes. Trump said that each of these exempted countries has an important security relationship with the US. He also added: “Any country not listed in this proclamation with which we have a security relationship remains welcome to discuss with the United States alternative ways to address the threatened impairment of the national security caused by imports of steel articles from that country”.
China vs. the United States
China is one country that is not listed. However, by the looks of it, China is not a country that will be discussing “alternative ways to address the threatened impairment of the (US) national security”. Instead, they fire back. China is the main cause of a glut in global steel-making capacity and it will be hardly touched by the US’ import sanctions. However and even though they do not want a trade war, they are ‘absolutely not afraid’ of one. Following Trump’s intentions for tariffs on up to $50 billion of Chinese products and the proposed complaint against China at the World Trade Organization (WTO) connected to allegations of intellectual property theft, China's Ministry of Commerce said it was "confident and capable of meeting any challenge”.
In response to Trump’s attacks, the Asian giant published its own list of proposed tariffs worth $3 billion, which includes a 15% tariff on 120 goods worth nearly $1billion (including fruit, nuts and wine) and a 25% tariff on eight goods worth almost $2 billion (including pork and aluminium scrap). Despite their actions, China’s Commerce Ministry urges the US to ‘cease and desist’, with Premier Li Keqiang saying: "A trade war does no good to anyone. There is no winner."
Is Trump going to win?
During his presidential campaign, one of Trump’s promises was to correct the US’ global imbalance, especially with China, however, it seems like his recent actions are doing more harm than good. Even if his tariff impositions result in a few aluminium smelters and steel mills in the short term, they risk millions of job losses in industries that rely on steel and aluminium; potentially endangering more jobs than they may save.
A country’s trade patterns are dictated by what the country is good at producing. China is known to be the world’s largest producer of steel, whilst steel is simply not one of the US’ strengths. Steel produced in America is 20% more expensive than that supplied by other countries. Naturally, it makes sense for US-based manufacturers to prefer buying their steel from overseas. Once Trump’s suggested tariffs are added onto steel and aluminium shipments from abroad, they will worsen US’ trade deficit and will impact the stock market. In an article for Asia Times, PhD candidate at the University of California at Berkeley Zhimin Li explains: “Domestic companies will inevitably suffer from higher input costs and lose their competitiveness. As a result, they will become less able to sell to foreign markets, leading to a deterioration of trade balances for the US.”
He continues: “Moreover, more expensive manufacturing materials will translate to higher prices at the cash register, putting upward pressure on inflation and prompting the US Federal reserve to raise interest rates even more aggressively than anticipated. This will add to investors’ anxiety and foster an unfavourable environment for equities.”
Looking at it all from China’s perspective doesn’t seem as scary or impactful. The tariffs on metals wouldn't hurt Chinese businesses considerably, as China exports just 1.1% of its steel to the US. But steel tariffs are not as significant as the coming fight over intellectual property.
On the other hand though, China has the power to do a lot to infuriate Trump. One of the products that the country depends on buying from the US are jets made by the American manufacturing company Boeing. However, Boeing is not China’s only option - they could potentially turn to any other non-US company such as Airbus for example. The impact of that could be tremendous, as in 2016 Boeing’s Chinese orders supported about 150 000 American jobs, according to the company’s then-Vice Chairman, Ray Conner.
China could also target American imports of sorghum and soybeans, whilst relying more on South America for soy. NPR notes: “Should China take measures against US soybean imports, it would likely hurt American farmers, a base of support for Trump.” An editorial in the state-run Global Times argues: “If China halves the proportion of the U.S. soybean imports, it will not have any major impact on China, but the US bean farmers will complain. They were mostly Trump supporters. Let them confront Trump.”
The list of potential actions that can threaten the American economy goes on, but the thing that we take from it is that the US could well be the one to lose, regardless of where China may apply pressure. So, is businessman Donald Trump, in an attempt to cure America’s international trade relations, on his way to be faced with possible unintended consequences and do more damage than good? Are his seemingly illogical policies threatening to make Americans poorer, on top of firing the first shots of a battle that no one, but him, wants to fight? Will this lead to hostility in the international trading system that will affect us all?
We’ll be waiting with bated breath.
Here Lee Wild, Head of Equity Strategy at Interactive Investor discusses corporate American investment ahead of third quarter reports.
Decent economic data has kept records tumbling on Wall Street, and who’s to say this run will unwind any time soon. Overnight, it’s talk Donald Trump could name Fed governor and market’s choice Jerome Powell as Fed chair Janet Yellen’s replacement that’s driving sentiment.
Winning streaks like this are always difficult for investors, as the head keeps asking how much higher? It requires calm and nerve to hold stocks in these situations, even more to continue buying.
Valuations are toppy in areas of the market both in the US and over here, but history is littered with examples where investors tried to call the market peak and failed. The experts who’ve predicted a crash for more than a year have been wrong, and investors who’d followed their lead will have missed out on substantial profits.
So, there are still plenty of good quality stocks to buy, which are growing profits, pay decent dividends, and have great prospects. That said, corporate America begins reporting third-quarter results in a couple of weeks, and the numbers had better be good, given the size of earnings beats already baked into stock prices.
It’s a big day for ex-dividends in London, among them the third of Next’s 45p special payouts and WPP’s generous interim, which lands highly-paid boss Martin Sorrell another huge windfall.
Even with the impact of ex-divs, the FTSE 100 has significant momentum right now and there’s a great chance it will break above 7,500 soon, putting it within 100 points of a new record. Miners and supermarkets are flavour of the month Thursday.
With little of interest coming out of the European Central Bank’s September policy meeting, it’ll be interesting to see if today’s minutes give any clues as to tapering plans or thoughts about how to handle the strong euro.
After that there’s a jumble of data out of the US, although the chance of any major upset is slim. Many traders could be tempted to keep their powder dry ahead of tomorrow’s US non-farm payrolls.
John Mackris, MAI, MRICS is an Executive Director within the Valuation & Advisory (V&A) group of Cushman & Wakefield Inc., a full-service worldwide real estate company with over 43,000 employees. Cushman & Wakefield’s V&A group provides advice on real estate equity and debt decisions to clients on a worldwide scale and comprises 1,670 professionals located in more than 130 offices in 30 countries worldwide. The group’s capabilities span valuation and advisory services relating to acquisition, disposition, financing, litigation, and financial reporting, and 18 practice groups deliver real estate strategies and solutions to clients with unique operational, technical and business requirements. Mr. Mackris is also a Midwest Region Leader within C&W’s Retail Industry specialty group.
How would you currently describe the US real estate appraisal industry and what shifts do you expect throughout 2017?
The US real estate industry has been evolving at an accelerating pace over recent years due to advancing technology and better equipped professionals. Access to an extensive level of market information at the appraiser’s finger tips combined with more sophisticated software to analyse this information has resulted in much more credible and supportable valuations. While the number of US-based appraisers has declined by about 2.5 percent per year over the last decade, the number of appraisals has increased, as appraisers have become more efficient. Over the next five to 10 years, this trend of fewer appraisers is anticipated to continue due to retirements, fewer new people entering the appraisal profession, economic factors, and increasing government regulation. The question is whether the rate of appraiser efficiency can continue; if not, expect appraisal fees and turnaround times to rise.
A Millennium Offer By Kroger: Kroger 50 Fuel Points
Specific to 2017, appraisers will need to be cognizant of the Trump administration’s new tax and deregulation policies, and how they will impact various types of real estate in different geographic locations. Most investors are anticipating lower corporate and personal income taxes, but potentially higher border import taxes. The implications of tax policy combined with deregulation will potentially have a varied approach across the US real estate market. Real estate in import-oriented areas might suffer, while areas with heavy manufacturing geared to domestic consumption will benefit. Overall, most economists are anticipating strong economic growth compared to the Obama years, where GDP growth hovered in the 1.0 to 2.0 percent range. If GDP growth reaches the 3.0 to 4.0 percent level, appraisers can anticipate significant changes in almost all property types, with new development and adaptive re-use becoming an increasing part of the assignment log. Strong economic growth, however, will also bring interest rate hikes from the Fed, which would push borrowing costs upwards and change investor purchasing assumptions. The key for appraisers in 2017, and more so than in years past, will be constant market research and understanding the factors that are driving each transaction.
What would you say are the biggest challenges facing real estate appraisal companies in the US?
There are many challenges facing appraisal companies, such as finding and retaining good employees, or staying compliant with an ever-growing barrage of governmental regulations, but these are not new to the industry. What has changed over the last decade is the need to incorporate more technology into the process and balance this against an overreliance on technology. Appraisal has often been described as a combination of science and art, with “art” being a synonym for common sense and experience. While the next generation of appraisers, or “millennials,” bring a strong technical skillset to the field, the key for this generation will be whether they can transition back to the basics of primary research. In laymen terms, this means picking up the phone and talking to market participants rather than simply searching on Google. With an ever-aging base of appraisers, this transition will be critical to good quality valuations in the years to come.
Do you foresee the need for legislative change in the near future, if so why?
Yes, there is a strong need for legislative change in the near future. The appraisal process has become more costly, more complicated, and less productive due to out-dated regulations. The federal regulatory structure for real estate appraisals (FIRREA) has not changed since 1989. As a result, appraisers have to deal with a layering effect of rules and regulations that discourages new people from entering the field, while also decreasing appraiser profitability. As an example, the industry has seen several new, time-consuming regulations pertaining to the role many senior appraisers conduct as a supervisor-appraiser to a trainee-appraiser. In discussing these new regulations with my peers, many have elected to drop plans they had for new hiring as they felt the time, cost, and effort of staying compliant were not worth the benefits afforded by the new hire. The Appraisal Institute is fighting to reduce the number of regulations, but it will take time to reverse the increased regulatory trend over the last decade.
In your opinion, what would be the best approach to modernize the US appraisal regulatory structure?
Often times, appraisers work in multiple states. This is common among appraisers who reside near their state border, and appraisers that specialize in unique property types, in which their expertise is in demand across a wider geographic area. As an appraiser based in Chicago, I often complete assignments in the nearby states of Wisconsin and Indiana. And as a specialist in retail shopping centers, I cover a territory which comprises the entire Midwest region of the US consisting of nine states. Needless to say, completing each state’s licensing regulations can be time consuming. What makes this process frustrating, however, is that these states all have slightly different requirements for education, reporting, application dates, and regulatory fees. While they all share the same goal of ensuring the integrity and professionalism of appraisers within their states, their varied regulations add unnecessary burdens on industry professionals. A simple solution would be if each state could outsource its regulation to a single interagency firm and provide a multi-state license. Or, at a bare minimum, each state should try and synchronize its regulations with the neighbouring states.
In your role, what are the main challenges you encounter and how do you work alongside your clients to overcome these?
An appraisal assignment contains many steps in a process, with the finished product comprising the final appraisal report. The first step is gathering property-specific information, such as rent rolls, leases, operating statements, etc. Gathering this information from the property contact as soon as the assignment is engaged is critical to an on-time delivery, as often times it may take the property contact several days to gather and deliver these items. Once delivered, the appraiser can then commence his or her analysis. The initial receipt of this information can often open up a need for additional items, which can then add pressure to the promised delivery date. Over the years, I have found that effective communication with my clients regarding the nuances of the property and what property-specific information is needed can effectively eliminate the need for deadline extensions. Some clients have realized that they can facilitate the process by informing their borrowers of what items will be needed prior to appraiser engagement, which can eliminate days of waiting.
Looking at the work of your peers, and in your past experience, how would you say the role of a real estate appraiser has changed over the past 20 years?
Surprisingly, the role of appraisers over the past 20 years has stayed the same more than it has changed. The market still looks to appraisers for the insight, expertise, knowledge, and unbiased view of market value. While technology has changed the process of appraising, the appraisers’ role, fortunately, has not changed. If appraisers are true to their mission, they can offer market participants an impartial view a property’s value, and the state of the micro- and macro-market in which it is situated. In an environment often tainted by varied interests, nothing can be more valuable than a real professional’s unbiased opinion.
President Barack Obama
President Obama delivered a defiant and upbeat State of the Union Address earlier this week, claiming that 2014 had been a ‘breakthrough year for America’.
“Our economy is growing and creating jobs at the fastest pace since 1999. Our unemployment rate is now lower than it was before the financial crisis. More of our kids are graduating than ever before. More of our people are insured than ever before. And we are as free from the grip of foreign oil as we’ve been in almost 30 years,” President Obama said.
“At this moment - with a growing economy, shrinking deficits, bustling industry, booming energy production - we have risen from recession freer to write our own future than any other nation on Earth. It’s now up to us to choose who we want to be over the next 15 years and for decades to come,” he said.
“Will we accept an economy where only a few of us do spectacularly well? Or will we commit ourselves to an economy that generates rising incomes and chances for everyone who makes the effort?”
Talking at Capitol Hill, President Obama stressed the importance of what he called ‘middle class economics’, calling on Americans to embrace equality
“Middle-class economics is… when everyone gets their fair shot, everyone does their fair share, everyone plays by the same set of rules. We don’t just want everyone to share in America’s success, we want everyone to contribute to our success,” he stated.
According to the President, middle-class economics means helping working families feel more secure in a world of constant change. Top of the list is helping people to afford childcare, college, health care, a home and retirement.
“Middle-class economics works. Expanding opportunity works. And these policies will continue to work as long as politics don’t get in the way. We can’t slow down businesses or put our economy at risk with government shutdowns or fiscal showdowns. We can’t put the security of families at risk by taking away their health insurance, or unravelling the new rules on Wall Street, or refighting past battles on immigration when we’ve got to fix a broken system,” President Obama said.
According to President Obama, since 2010, America has put more people back to work than Europe, Japan, and all advanced economies combined. The country’s manufacturing sector has added almost 800,000 new jobs. He also added that there are millions of Americans who work in jobs that didn’t even exist 10 or 20 years ago - jobs at companies like Google, eBay and Tesla.
“No one knows for certain which industries will generate the jobs of the future. But we do know we want them here in America. We know that. Middle-class economics is all about building the most competitive economy anywhere, the place where businesses want to locate and hire.
President Obama also put a call out to further develop America’s infrastructure, calling on a bipartisan infrastructure plan that could create more than 30 times as many jobs per year, and make this country stronger for decades to come. “Twenty-first century businesses need twenty-first century infrastructure - modern ports, and stronger bridges, faster trains and the fastest Internet,” he remarked.
International trade and export were also on the agenda.
“Twenty-first century businesses, including small businesses, need to sell more American products overseas. Today, our businesses export more than ever, and exporters tend to pay their workers higher wages. But as we speak, China wants to write the rules for the world’s fastest-growing region. That would put our workers and our businesses at a disadvantage. Why would we let that happen? We should write those rules. We should level the playing field. That’s why I’m asking both parties to give me trade promotion authority to protect American workers, with strong new trade deals from Asia to Europe that aren’t just free, but are also fair,” said President Obama.
“95% of the world’s customers live outside our borders. We can’t close ourselves off from those opportunities. More than half of manufacturing executives have said they’re actively looking to bring jobs back from China. So let’s give them one more reason to get it done.”
