Judge Reduces Menendez Sentences, Parole Now Possible.
A Los Angeles judge has resentenced Erik and Lyle Menendez—convicted of the 1989 murders of their parents in their Beverly Hills mansion—giving the infamous brothers their first real shot at parole in over three decades.
Judge Michael Jesic reduced their original sentence of life without parole to 50 years to life, meaning both men, now in their 50s, are eligible for parole. The decision sets the stage for a high-stakes hearing before the California parole board next month.

Erik and Lyle Menendez
The Menendez brothers, aged 18 and 21 at the time of the crime, admitted to shooting their parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, at point-blank range with shotguns in their family living room. Their claim of having acted out of self-defence after years of alleged sexual abuse has long polarized public opinion.
In an emotional courtroom appearance, the brothers acknowledged the horror of their actions.
"I had to stop being selfish and immature to really understand what my parents went through in those last moments," said Erik Menendez, now 54. He described the "shock, confusion and betrayal" his parents must have experienced in their final moments.
RELATED: Did the Menendez Brothers Receive Payment for Netflix's Monster Series?
Lyle Menendez, 57, grew visibly emotional as he addressed the court and his surviving family members.
"I lied to you and forced you into a spotlight of public humiliation," he said, voice cracking with emotion.
The district attorney’s office opposed the resentencing, arguing that the brothers have never fully accepted responsibility for their crimes and continue to shift blame.
"They've done all these positive things in prison," said Deputy District Attorney Habib Balian.
"But when reversing a jury’s unanimous verdict in such a brutal murder case, it's important to make certain they are truly rehabilitated."
Despite this opposition, the judge acknowledged that while the original life-without-parole sentence was justified at the time, current guidelines made the brothers eligible for reconsideration. He described their rehabilitation as "remarkable", citing their decades of work in prison, including the creation of hospice programs for elderly inmates.
RELATED: Menendez Brothers Demand New Trial After Shocking New Evidence.
Support for the brothers has grown in recent years, spurred by a new wave of documentaries, including the Netflix drama Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story, which introduced the case to younger generations. Celebrities such as Kim Kardashian and Rosie O’Donnell have even voiced support for their release.
Defense attorney Mark Geragos, who represented the brothers during their original trials, called the ruling a major step forward.
"Today is a great day," he told reporters. "We’re one huge step closer to bringing the boys home."
Among those testifying in court was cousin Anamaria Baralt, who pleaded with the judge to give her relatives a second chance.
"It's been a nightmare," she said. "I am desperate for this process to be over." She described the brothers as having taken "ownership of their actions", adding, "They are very different men from the boys they were."

The Menendez former home in Beverly Hills
Also speaking on their behalf was Anerae "X-Raided" Brown, a rapper who credited the brothers with helping him gain release from prison, and a retired Florida judge who said he had never testified in support of a convicted defendant before.
The brothers’ parole eligibility now rests with the California parole board, which will hold a hearing on June 13. Governor Gavin Newsom is also weighing a clemency request, supported by a completed—but undisclosed—risk assessment that reportedly labels the brothers a "moderate risk of violence."
RELATED: What Became of the Menendez Brothers' Beverly Hills Mansion?
While the road ahead remains uncertain and the emotional scars of the past still linger, the Menendez brothers have, at the very least, earned a second look.
As the Menendez brothers await their parole hearing, emotions remain raw and opinions divided. Their actions were undeniably horrific, but their decades of remorse and rehabilitation raise difficult questions about justice, redemption, and the capacity for change. The families of both the victims and the incarcerated deserve resolution rooted in truth, not spectacle or sentiment.
Whether parole is granted or denied, one can only hope the process brings clarity, healing, and a deeper understanding of the case that has haunted the public for more than 30 years. In the end, may justice be served — and may the truth ultimately prevail.
